Case archive

Full cases, both sides, every current topic.

Eight complete cases written for CUDL students: affirmative and negative Lincoln-Douglas, a Policy 1AC and 1NC, pro and con Public Forum, and two archived Lincoln-Douglas cases from the 2026 National Tournament. Every piece of evidence points to a real source with a link. Read the case, then read the source and cut your own card.

Archive last updated September 14, 2026. New cases follow each NSDA topic release.

A student delivering a speech from a binder in front of a class

CUDL sample cases

Written to be run against each other in practice rounds. Speech times are noted for a clear, conversational pace.

8 cases

Lincoln-Douglas  |  Affirmative

Lincoln-Douglas affirmative: existential risk and the duty to the future

Resolved: Outer space colonization is a moral imperative.

A complete Lincoln-Douglas affirmative case on the September/October 2026 resolution: value, criterion, definitions, two contentions with cited evidence, and a 1AR block file.

September/October 2026  |  5:45 at conversational pace  | 
Lincoln-Douglas  |  Negative

Lincoln-Douglas negative: obligations to the living

Resolved: Outer space colonization is a moral imperative.

A complete Lincoln-Douglas negative case on the September/October 2026 resolution: value, criterion, two contentions with cited evidence, and the NR strategy.

September/October 2026  |  6:45 at conversational pace  | 
Policy  |  Affirmative (1AC)

Policy 1AC: a universal public plan with two advantages

Resolved: The United States federal government should establish national health insurance in the United States.

A full first affirmative constructive for the 2026-27 Policy resolution: plan text, inherency, two advantages (coverage and medical debt) with evidence pointers to KFF, CBO, and KFF Health News, and solvency.

2026-27 season  |  7:50 at a clear pace  | 
Policy  |  Negative (1NC)

Policy 1NC: topicality, spending disadvantage, public option counterplan, case answers

Resolved: The United States federal government should establish national health insurance in the United States.

A first negative constructive against a single-payer affirmative on the 2026-27 Policy resolution: a topicality argument, a spending disadvantage, a public option counterplan with net benefit, and case answers, with evidence pointers.

2026-27 season  |  7:50 at a clear pace  | 
Public Forum  |  Pro

Public Forum pro: household prices and the grid

Resolved: The United States federal government should enact a moratorium on hyperscale data center construction.

A complete Public Forum pro case on the September/October 2026 resolution: two contentions with evidence pointers to the Berkeley Lab data center report and state policy trackers, framing, and weighing.

September/October 2026  |  3:55  | 
Public Forum  |  Con

Public Forum con: the moratorium is the wrong tool

Resolved: The United States federal government should enact a moratorium on hyperscale data center construction.

A complete Public Forum con case on the September/October 2026 resolution: two contentions (the pause does not solve the price problem; it forfeits investment and capacity), evidence pointers, and weighing.

September/October 2026  |  3:55  | 
Lincoln-Douglas  |  Affirmative

Lincoln-Douglas affirmative: liberty is what security is for

Resolved: Democracies ought to prioritize the protection of civil liberties over national security.

An archived Lincoln-Douglas affirmative on the 2026 National Tournament resolution: consent-based framework, two contentions on surveillance and emergency powers, and a 1AR block file. Useful for practice rounds and framework study.

2026 National Tournament (archive)  |  5:45  | 
Lincoln-Douglas  |  Negative

Lincoln-Douglas negative: the state's first duty

Resolved: Democracies ought to prioritize the protection of civil liberties over national security.

An archived Lincoln-Douglas negative on the 2026 National Tournament resolution: a Hobbesian framework, contentions on the precondition of order and democratic self-defense, and the NR collapse.

2026 National Tournament (archive)  |  6:45  | 

Thousands more cases, free

Two community archives hold far more than any league could write. Both are free and both are what serious programs use.

  • Open Evidence Project: Policy files from summer debate institutes, published every year by the National Debate Coaches Association. Affirmatives, case negatives, disadvantages, counterplans, kritiks, and topicality on each season's resolution, as Word files you can download.
  • openCaselist: the NDCA's disclosure wiki, where competitive teams post the cases they read at tournaments, with citations and often full text, across Policy, Lincoln-Douglas, and Public Forum.
  • NSDA topic pages: the official resolutions, sample Congress dockets, Extemp questions, and World Schools motions.

CUDL does not host copies of those files; download them from the source so you get the current version and the authors get credit. Ask a CUDL coach for a guided tour of either archive.

How to use a case you did not write

  1. Read the whole case aloud once, with the timer, before you change a word.
  2. Open every source. Read the page around the quotation. Cut your own card if the evidence holds up; drop it if it does not.
  3. Rewrite the framework in your own words. Judges can tell when a debater is reading someone else's philosophy.
  4. Write the block file: every case in this archive lists the answers to expect, and the rebuttal drill covers the generic ones.
  5. Run it against the matching case from the other side, then debrief with the practice round plan.

New cases by email

A message when cases for a new topic are published, usually within two weeks of the NSDA release.

Prep material by topic

Every current and recent resolution with its key clash, the CUDL cases and primers for it, and starter sources.

Open the topic archive See the next-topic plan

Want a case written for your school's topic?

Partner schools can request a case or a block file for any current resolution.